Under a law passed by the Texas Legislature, homeowners who apply for a new
property tax homestead exemption must provide proof to the county
appraisal district that they live in the house they claim as their principal residence.
The new law took effect September 1st, 2011.
House Bill 252 requires a copy of the homeowner’s Texas driver’s license or state
identification card and the homeowner’s vehicle registration receipt be sent with the
homestead exemption application. If the homeowner does not own a vehicle they
can send a current utility bill showing name and address, along with an affidavit provided
in the application indicating non-ownership of a vehicle.
For more details, click here to read the full State of Texas,
Susan B. Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts press release.
Click here to download the homestead exemption application form for
property owners and county appraisal districts.
For more info contact Ellmaker Realty at info@ellmakerrealty.com
Why Investors Like Texas
Texas Investment Paradigm
Each year I make presentations to high-net-worth investors and private equity fund managers. Frequently, these people live in New York or Laguna Beach but invest a sizable portion of their funds in Texas real estate. They understand “the Texas investment paradigm.”
Why is it that Texas is such an attractive investment for these large investors? My colleague Dr. Ali Anari and I have come up with nine reasons:
- Texas is coming out of the Great Recession and leading the United States in the current economic recovery.
- The Texas economy is big and growing.
- The Texas economy is profitable.
- Texas has a growing population.
- Texas economy is an international economy.
- Tax burden is less in Texas.
- Texas has an affordable housing sector.
- Texans have entrepreneurial spirit.
- Texans are mobile.
Actually, there is a 10th reason, but we won’t publish it, because we don’t want Michigan or California to know about it.
Reason One: Texas is leading the nation out of recession
The Texas economy suffered less in terms of lost jobs and output in the Great Recession. The duration of the recession, measured in terms of the number of months of job losses, was shorter for Texas while the intensity of the recession, measured in terms of the highest job loss rate in the trough month, was lower for Texas than for the nation.
While the U.S. economy experienced its first month of job loss in May 2008, Texas continued to create jobs for eight more months until January 2009. The state’s economy experienced job losses for 16 months from January 2009 to April 2010 compared with 28 months for the nation from May 2008 to August 2010.
The Texas economy proved its resilience, and now is leading the U.S. economic recovery. From May 2010 to May 2011, the U.S. economy added 946,000 jobs, 198,400 of which, or 20.9 percent, were generated in Texas.
The chart and the table paint a pretty picture. I will discuss the other reasons Texas is attractive to investors in posts to come.
Contact Craig Ellmaker at craig@austin-cashflow.com or 512-294-3067 for information on Real Estate investments in the Austin area.
Austin home prices improved year-over-year last month, while total sold fell 31 percent from October 2009, the Austin Board of Realtors reported Thursday.
The group's Multiple Listing Service data showed total homes sold decreased to 1,221 in October, while home listings were up 8 percent to 9,703 properties on the market. At the same time, the median price jumped 10 percent to about $198,500.
“Higher priced homes have continued to sell well over the last few months. This trend has been a driver in the steady increases in the median and average prices the market has experienced during the same period,” Austin Board of Realtors Chairman John Horton said.
“It has been a unique year in evaluating trends in the real estate market due to the impact of the expired homebuyer tax credits. Monthly comparisons are still being skewed by the artificial stimulus the tax credits provided.”
Sales volume year-to-date was down 5 percent compared with the same 10 months last year, with a total 15,228 homes sold. Austin residential properties spent an average of 92 days on the market last month, up 26 percent from 2009.
Sales activity in the higher prices ranges continued to increase on a year-to-date basis in October with homes priced at $500,000 and above experiencing double-digit increases, according to the report.
Read more:
Austin home prices up 10%, sales down, report says | Austin Business Journal
10 Markets Most Likely to Appreciate Forbes magazine turned to real estate research firm Local Market Monitor to figure out which markets have the greatest likelihood of price appreciation because they offer a mix of jobs weighted toward growth industries.These are the top markets, the research company concludes:1. Raleigh-Cary, N.C.2. McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, Texas3. Austin-Round Rock, Texas4. Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, Tenn.5. San Antonio, Texas6. Colorado Springs, Colo.7. Albuquerque, N.M.8. Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, Colo.9. Springfield, Mo.10. Indianapolis-Carmel, Ind
Here are two interesting articles from the Wall Street Journal about the strength of the Texas real estate market. The first article discusses the attractiveness of investing in the stock of publicly traded, Texas homebuilders. Because the broader economic indicators in Texas point to a stronger economic recovery in Texas (and less of a recession to start with), and because home prices never spiraled out of control in major urban areas of Texas, a lot of investors are betting on the long term viability of new home builders in Texas, as demand continues to grow (Note: the full text of this article is available only to online subscribers, but the summary can be accessed).
The second article from the WSJ site, Marketwatch.com highlights a recent NAR study which shows foreign buyers are purchasing homes primarily in 4 states over the past year: Arizona, California, Florida and Texas. The fact that Texas rates among the top four, without having suffered the same catastrophic reductions in real estate values as the other three, says a lot about the stability of home values in the Texas housing market, and is certainly something worth mentioning to prospective home buyers. The largest number of foreign buyers are from Canada, followed by Mexico, the United Kingdom and China. As a group, 55% of foreign buyers paid cash, compared with only 8% of U.S. buyers paying cash in the last year.
Forbes: Austin best economic recovery in U.S. Austin Business Journal The Austin-Round Rock area tied for first on a list of large metros where the recession is easing. Central Texas tied Washington D.C. in the Forbes.com ranking that compiles job growth and real estate industry improvement, among other indicators. Washington has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the nation, 6.2 percent, and the city produced more goods and services than another other in 2008. Austin has also maintained relatively lower jobless rates, though the number increased to 7.6 percent last month from 7 percent, according to the Texas Workforce Commission. Statewide, the rate was unchanged at 8.2 percent from December to January, compared to 9.7 percent nationally. Austin and Washington D.C. also benefit from their high government job generation, according to Forbes. The number of Central Texas jobs increased just shy of 1 percent between 2007 and 2009, more than any other city included in the research. Dallas came in second on the ranking behind Austin. The number of jobs there are expected to increase more than 7 percent in the next three years. San Antonio and Houston also made the top 10 list. Job growth projections were based on information from Moody's. The listing also considered median home sale price changes and Metropolitan Gross Domestic Product.
For more information please contact Craig Ellmaker at craig@ellmakerrealty.com
Thursday, February 25, 2010, 9:58am CST Facebook opening 200-person Austin office Austin Business Journal - by Jacob Dirr Staff Writer Facebook is creating 200 jobs in Austin, thanks to a $1.4 million incentive from the state of Texas. The move will be the first major U.S. expansion outside of Palo Alto, Calif., where the company is headquartered, according to officials. It is investing about $3.1 million to set up operations in Texas, according to Gov. Rick Perry's office. Facebook employs about 800 people. It reported about $50 million in revenue last year. 'Facebook continues to grow and Austin, with its deep talent pool, would allow us to hire the high-caliber employees we need to properly serve the people, advertisers and developers that rely on our service,' Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg said. Gov. Perry said the new jobs will enhance the Central Texas’ robust technology industry and strengthen the economy. All contents of this site © American City Business Journals Inc. All rights reserved. Link to Article: http://austin.bizjournals.com/austin/stories/2010/02/22/daily44.html
For more info about the Austin are please contact Craig at craig@ellmakerrealty.com
In the late 80’s and early 90’s in Austin, job growth stopped, real estate values dropped and people left town. Probably because of the severity of that recession, Austin has faired much better this time. Home prices did not increase more than could be supported by median family incomes. Thanks to Texas’s home equity laws, consumers could not borrow against their home appreciation nearly as easily as homeowners in other states – which helped keep home prices stable and consumer debt manageable. If you don’t have a bubble then you don’t have a bust. While most other major real estate markets have seen home prices drop by as much as 50% and experienced high unemployment, Austin’s median home price has been stable or seen only a small drop. Job losses have been slight.
Now, Forbes and Moody’s Economy.com projects Austin's economy will grow by 32% over the five year period from 2007 to 2012. Not only is Austin’s economy growing, but it's growth rate is nearly 50% higher than #2 ranked Fort Myers, Florida. Equally important to Austin’s economic growth is Austin's population growth which is expected to grow by an amazing 15%.
“To compile our list, we looked at all of the country's 363 metropolitan areas, defined by the U.S. Census Bureau as a geographic region with a "core urban area" of at least 50,000 people. Because many small metro areas are high growth--and because we wanted to show growth in large cities as well--we split the group into two classes: the largest 100 metro areas (with at least 528,000 people) and everyone else. We use projections run for us by Moody's Economy.com to show growth in GMP between 2007-2012.
Of course, if one looks at economic growth in the country's largest 100 metros, the usual suspects jump to the top of the list. With an estimated 32% GMP growth from 2007-2012, Austin, Texas, is the winner for big metros. Atlanta, Seattle, Orlando, Houston and San Jose, Calif., also appear high on the list. What do they all have in common? They're tech hubs with proximity to universities and a healthy increase in population. Austin's population, for example, is expected to increase by nearly 15% by 2012, according to Moody's Economy.com forecasts.”
Full Article: http://www.forbes.com/2008/01/30/economy-cities-alabama-biz-cx_bw_0130econcities.html
For more info contact Craig Ellmaker at craig@austin-cashflow.com
Wednesday, August 5, 2009, 11:47am CDT
Austin Business Journal
Memo to working moms: Austin's your kind of town
Working moms trying to balance family and the workplace may be better off in Austin than a lot of other cities around the country.
That according to ForbesWoman's first ever list of the "Best Cities for Working Mothers," which ranks Austin second, just behind No. 1 New York City.
“There are numerous considerations for what working moms want in their choice of a city,” said ForbesWoman writer Heidi Brown, who edited the list. “We based our rankings on the premise that different mothers have different needs. Beyond good healthcare and safety, mothers who work want a city which offers plentiful jobs, high salaries and abundant daycare options.”
To create the list, ForbesWoman ranked 50 of the largest continental U.S. metropolitan statistical areas by different categories, from earnings and unemployment to number of daycare and preschools and per-capita expenditure per pupil.
Rounding out the top 10 cities on the list, in order, are Minneapolis-St. Paul, Milwaukee, Portland, Cincinnati, San Jose, Pittsburgh, Seattle-Tacoma and Denver.
For more info about the Austin area please contact Craig Ellmaker at 512-784-1494 or at craig@ellmakerrealty.com
Information provided by Ted C. Jones, PhD, Senior Vice
President—Chief Economist, Stewart Title Guaranty Company. --April
2009
Time to buy is RIGHT NOW!
U.S. home prices have declined across the nation in the past
year—albeit at varying levels. Latest national price declines range
from as little as 4.5 percent (Dallas, Texas) on a year-over-year
basis in February to as great as 35.2 percent (Phoenix, AZ) according
to S&P’s Case-Shiller Home Price Indices.
It is the anticipation by many prospective buyers for further home
price erosion that keeps them on the sidelines and from participating
in homeownership despite the lowest interest rates since Freddie Mac
commenced the statistical series in 1971.
While further price declines may be realized, the likelihood of
rising interest rates makes purchasing now a better option than
waiting for further potential value declines. Simply stated, there is
a greater possibility of interest rate increases than potential value
declines. Even with the price decline, the interest rate increase may
result in the buyer no longer being able to qualify for a loan on a
home they wish to purchase for which they qualify today. Despite
facing a potential in declining home values, now may be a better time
to buy.
To make the comparison simple, let’s assume a loan amount today of
$100,000 with a 30-year fixed-rate residential loan at 5 percent.
Nationwide at the time of this writing, the average 30-year rate was
4.85 percent per Freddie Mac.
A buyer today at 5 percent interest borrowing $100,000 has a monthly
principle and interest payment of $536.82. If prices decline 5
percent (and the loan amount does also) and interest rates rise just
½ of 1 percent, then the monthly payment remains the same ($539.40).
So if rates go up just 1 percent to 6 percent per year, then prices
must drop at least 10 percent for that same buyer to qualify for the
same monthly payment. A 1.5 percent increase in rates to 6.5 percent
requires a 15 percent price decline, and a 2 percent increase
necessitates a 20 percent price decline to qualify.
(Note: This 1 percent interest rate change to a 10 percent price
change is only true when interest rates are 5 percent as they are
today.)
Why will rates increase in the future more than prices decline?
Looking at the S&P’s Case-Shiller Home Price Indices, the aggregate
20-city prices have already declined 29.1 percent since peaking in
July 2006. For many cities, much of the price decline has already
taken place. And Austin has seen very little decline in the median
home price! And why will rates increase? Massive deficit spending has
a high potential to drive up inflation and hence interest rates.
Additionally, since these are the lowest rates since 1971, it’s not
hard to project the likelihood of rate increases.
So NOW may be the best time ever to buy a home and take advantage of
truly historic low interest rates!
Contact Craig Ellmaker at craig@austin-cashflow.com or at 512-784-1494
Filed under: Real Estate, Market Conditions, For Sale, For Rent/Lease, Announcements, Industry, Point2, Finances, Buyer Information, Seller Information, Austin, Texas Community Information
Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 1:28pm CDT
Austin ranks No. 1 for job growth potential
Texas dominates a new list on job growth potential among the nations
largest metropolitan areas.
Austin ranks No. 1 on the list of big cities for employment potential
from NewGeography.com. The Capital City posted modest job growth of
just 1 percent in 2008 but that was still better than a lot of other
big cities. That growth, coupled with Austins long-term potential to
continue creating new jobs, garnered it the top spot.
Texas major metros round out the top five spots on the big cities
list, with Houston coming in 2nd, San Antonio 3rd, Fort
Worth-Arlington 4th and Dallas 5th.
The list, based largely on job growth in regions across the nation
over the long, middle and short term, has changed over the years, but
the reports authors say the employment landscape has never looked
like this.
'In past iterations, we saw many fast-growing economies--some adding
jobs at annual rates of 3 percent to 5 percent,' said research Joel
Kotkin. 'Meanwhile, some grew more slowly, and others actually lost
jobs. This year, however, you can barely find a fast-growing economy
anywhere in this vast, diverse country. In 2008, 2 percent growth
made a city a veritable boom town.'
Consequently, Kotkin said, this year’s list might more aptly be
called the “'east worst.' Still, he said, those least worst economies
today largely mirror those that topped last years list, even if
those regions have recently experienced less growth than in prior
years.
In Austin for instance the 1 percent job growth in 2008 was less than
a third of its annual average since 2003.
Looking at the complete list of metro areas—including large, medium
and small cities Texas again does well in the top five. Odessa ranks
No. 1 on the overall list, followed by Grand Junction, Colo.;
Longview; Houma, La.; and Killeen-Temple.
Contact Craig Ellmaker, Broker for more details at craig@austin-cashflow.com or 512-784-1494
Filed under: Real Estate, Market Conditions, For Sale, For Rent/Lease, Announcements, Industry, Point2, Finances, Buyer Information, Seller Information, Austin, Texas Community Information
The First-Time Homebuyer Credit is definitely a hot topic in the marketplace. Since a lot of consumers are still confused on the details, I have provided you a link to the IRS website. You will find the IRS 5405 form with all of the details including eligibility, amount of the credit, repayment of the credit, etc.
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f5405.pdf
Understanding Housing Tax Credits
There's upside to going green, doing short sale
By Ilyce Glink, Thursday, March 5, 2009.
inman News
Editor's note: The original article contained an error. Those homebuyers who are eligible for the $8,000 tax credit can claim that credit when filing their 2008 tax return.
As we move further into tax season, Treasury and IRS employees have been busy filling in the missing pieces on all of the new tax laws that were passed as part of the recent stimulus package.
When it comes to real estate, the rules are at best confusing. Let's shed a little compact fluorescent light on the subject:
2008 $7,500 tax credit vs. 2009 $8,000 tax credit
If you were a first-time buyer who purchased a home after April 8, 2008 through the end of the year, you might have realized that you could get a $7,500 tax credit on your 2008 tax return. This is a nonrefundable tax credit, which means that even if you don't pay $7,500 in taxes you'll still get that much in the way of a refund, provided you meet other qualifying details, according to Mark Luscombe, principal analyst for the tax and accounting group at CCH.
However, the 2008 $7,500 tax credit must be paid back in $500 equal installments over 15 years, which means that this tax credit effectively functions as a zero-interest loan. (Luscombe said the fine print in the new law says that if the taxpayer dies, the rest of the payback is forgiven. It's unclear whether both homeowners have to die if the property is owned jointly -- or just one of the homeowners.)
If you chose to close on Dec. 31, 2008, rather than Jan. 2, 2009 (perhaps to be able to itemize the interest and points on your 2008 tax return), you may be kicking yourself. The recently signed stimulus bill took the $7,500 tax credit and turned it into an $8,000 tax credit -- one that doesn't need to be repaid, Luscombe said.
But there are some wrinkles that require you to pay attention. To qualify for the $8,000 tax credit, you must earn less than $150,000 in adjusted gross income for couples filing jointly. Also, you must stay in the house (assuming it's your primary residence) for three years or there may be some payback requirement, according to Luscombe. (He's unclear how the IRS would be able to follow up, and some of the regulations and filing requirements aren't fully explained at the moment.) ... CONTINUED
The $8,000 first-time-buyer credit is good only for homes purchased by first-time buyers (or anyone who hasn't owned a home in the last three years) from Jan. 1, 2009 through Nov. 30, 2009 -- so don't wait to close in December or you'll miss out.
You can elect to take the credit on your 2008 taxes -- if you bought your house in 2009, you'll still qualify for the $8,000 tax credit on your 2008 tax return.
Going Green? Take a Tax Credit
The stimulus package eased requirements on energy tax credits. The $500 lifetime tax credit for building improvements has been increased to $1,500 for such improvements as the installation of energy-efficient windows, insulation, doors and mechanical systems.
In addition, you can take a 30 percent tax credit for every dollar you spend on things like solar heaters, fuel cells and heat pumps, Luscombe explained. The individual limits on particular expenditures have mostly been eliminated.
Foreclosure and Short-Sale Forgiveness
For those who are going through foreclosure or a short sale, where the house is selling for less than the amount owed on the mortgage, the forgiven debt will not be taxed as income through 2012.
"Up to $2 million of mortgage debt on the principal residence that has been forgiven can be excluded from income," Luscombe explained. "Taxpayers do not have to put it on their tax form," even if the lender has sent an IRS Form 1099.
For more info regarding the Austin Real Estate market contact Craig Ellmaker at 512-784-1494 or craig@ellmakerrealty.com
The number of active listings are up 1.6% over last year.
The number of new listings are down this week 12.50% (compared to 2/24/09 - 3/1/09).
Pendings are down this week 24.32%.
Sold residential units are down 26.32% compared to the same week last year.
How are we doing on sales prices? To get the full picture, check out the our web site for latest sold data.
For additional information on the current market, please contact Craig Ellmaker at 512-784-1494 or craig@ellmakerrealty.com
The Week in Review
Units for Sale:
Feb. 24 - Feb. 28, 2009
(compared to the same week in 2008)
New listings down this week 12.50%
Pendings are down 24.32%
Solds down 26.32%
As for Average Prices:
Feb. 24 - Feb. 28, 2009
Sold average sales prices increased 7.79% to $252,043. In 2008 it was $233,826 for the same week.
The Month In Review
February 2009
Units for Sale: (compared to February 2008)
New listings were down 22.35%.
Pendings were down 22.14%.
Solds decreased by 28.64%.
As for Average Prices:
The "New Listings" average list price is up 4.30% to 328,804. In February 2008 the average list price was $315,238.
Sold average sales prices increased 5.16% to $245,430. For February 2008 it was $233,390.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
H.R. 1, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, passed
the House on February 13, 2009, by a vote of 246 - 184. Later that
day, the Senate also passed the bill by a vote of 60 - 38. The
President signed the bill on February 17, 2009. The bill is a $780
billion package, with roughly 35% of the package devoted to tax cuts
(mostly for 2009) and the rest to spending intended to occur in 2009
and 2010. The mix of provisions of interest to REALTORS® changed
frequently throughout the legislative process, with changes
continuing to be made just hours before the measure was released
prior to the vote. In the end, the elements of NAR’s housing agenda
were included. Congress and the President have announced that a
finance and housing package (including tax provisions) will be the
next big initiative, so Congress has by no means finished its work
as it affects the housing industry and REALTORS®.
The bill includes the following provisions:
Homebuyer Tax Credit
FHA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Loan Limits
Neighborhood Stabilization
Commercial Real Estate
Rural Housing Service
Low Income-Housing Grants
Tax Exempt Housing Bonds
Energy Efficient Housing Tax Credits & Grants
Transportation Investments
Broadband Deployment
Homebuyer Tax Credit – The bill provides for a $8,000 tax credit
that would be available to first-time home buyers for the purchase of
a principal residence on or after January 1, 2009 and before December
1, 2009. The credit does not require repayment. Most of the
mechanics of the credit will be the same as under the 2008 rules:
the credit will be claimed on a tax return to reduce the purchaser's
income tax liability. If any credit amount remains unused, then the
unused amount will be refunded as a check to the purchaser.
Chart Highlighting the Major Modifications to the First-Time
Homebuyer Tax Credit> (PDF: 309K)
NAR's Presentation: The 2009 First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit (PDF:
319K)
FHA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Loan Limits -The bill reinstates last
year's 2008 loan limits for FHA, Freddie Mac, and Fannie Mae loans.
These limits were equal to the greater of 125% of the 2008 local area
median home price or $271,050 for FHA and $417,000 for Fannie and
Freddie, with an overall maximum cap of $729,750. For the few areas
where the 2009 limits were higher, the higher limits will apply. In
addition, the bill includes language providing the HUD Secretary with
the discretion, if warranted, to increase the loan limit for any
“sub-area”, i.e.an area smaller than a county. The Secretary's
discretion is again limited by the $729,750 cap. These 2009 limits
will expire December 31, 2009.
The inclusion of these loan limit provisions in the final bill is a
victory for homeowners, buyers and Realtors. While these new limits
were included in version of the original stimulus bill approved by
the House, the bill first approved by the Senate did not. NAR's Call
for Action to both the House and the Senate prior to the final vote
advocated strongly for the provisions which were then included in the
final bill approved by both Chambers.
Estimated 2009 FHA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Loan Limits> (PDF:
1.3M)
Neighborhood Stabilization – Division A, Title XII of the bill
provides $2,000,000,000 in additional funding for the Neighborhood
Stabilization Program (NSP). The NSP was created by the Housing and
Economic Recovery Act of 2009 (Public Law 110–289) to provide grants
through the Community Development Block Grant program (CDBG) to
states and localities to address the problems that can be created
when whole neighborhoods are decimated by foreclosures. The funds can
be used to purchase, manage, repair and resell foreclosed and
abandoned properties. In addition, the funds can also be used by
states and localities to establish financing methods for the purchase
and redevelopment of foreclosed properties. After purchase the homes
must be used to assist individuals and families with incomes at or
below 120% of area median income. Twenty-five percent of funds must
be used for households with incomes at or below 50% of area median
income. By leveraging their expertise in partnership with others
from both the public and private sector, Realtors® in many
communities have been making important contributions to their local
communities’ neighborhood stabilization programs.
Commercial Real Estate - Commercial real estate is impacted primarily
through those provisions of the bill focused on green building and
energy efficiency as well as business tax incentives. H.R. 1 provides
significant funds for state energy programs, which could be used to
support commerical property owners' investment in energy efficiency
upgrades while commercial property owners seeking to invest in
alternative energy systems for onsite power generation would benefit
from the Department of Energy Renewable Energy Loan Guarantees
Program. Of particular benefit to small businesses would be certain
provisions of the bill that provide tax relief in the area of bonus
depreciation and capital expenditures, as well as the 5-Year
carryback of net operating losses for small businesses.
Rural Housing Service Rural Housing Service – The bill provides an
additional $500 million to existing USDA Rural Housing programs. The
RHS provides both a guaranteed loan program and a direct housing loan
program for those meeting the program’s eligibility criteria. The
direct loan program will receive $270 million while $230 million will
be allocated for unsubsidized guaranteed loans. It has been reported
that this level of funding would provide for an additional 192,000
homeowners.
Low Income Housing Grants - Allow states to trade in a portion of
their 2009 low-income housing tax credits for Treasury grants to
finance the construction or acquisition and rehabilitation of
low-income housing, including those with or without tax credit
allocations.
Tax-Exempt Housing Bonds - Tax-exempt interest earned on specified
state and local bonds issued during 2009 and 2010 will not be subject
to the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). In addition, financial
institutions will have greater capacity to purchase tax-exempt state
and local bonds.
Energy Efficient Housing Tax Credits & Grants - To promote green jobs
and energy independence, ARRA invests significantly in efforts to
make homes and buildings more energy efficient. The bill provides
state and local governments with $6 billion in energy efficiency and
conservation grants for energy audits, retrofits and financial
incentives. Through 2010, homeowners will be able to claim a 30% tax
credit (up from 10%) for purchases of new furnaces, windows and
insulation. Another $5 billion will be available to modernize the
nation’s electricity grid and install smart meters on homes that help
to save consumers money. There is also $5 billion for weatherization
assistance for low income households and $2 billion for federally
assisted housing (section 8) efficiency efforts.
Transportation Investments - The bill provides $46.7 billion to
states and localities for capital investment for surface
transportation projects including highways, bridges, transit, and
rail projects. NAR policy supports increased spending on the types
of transportation infrastructure addressed in the bill with the
exception of Amtrak and high-speed inter-city rail where NAR has no
policy. These investments will tend to moderate traffic congestion
and support a variety of transportation alternatives which will
improve the quality of life of American communities and bolster the
value of real estate.
Broadband Deployment - The bill creates $7.2 billion in grants to
promote broadband deployment in unserved and underserved areas and
for mapping the availability of broadband service in the U.S. Any
entity is eligible to apply for a grant including municipalities,
public/private partnerships and private companies as long as they
comply with the grant conditions. The grants are subject to “network
neutrality” requirements to ensure that broadband networks be free of
restrictions on content, sites, or platforms, on the kinds of
equipment that may be attached, and on the modes of communication
allowed.
The bill also charges the FCC is with developing a national broadband
plan that shall seek to ensure that all Americans have access to
broadband capability and shall establish benchmarks for meeting that
goal.
These provisions are important victories for REALTORS because
increased broadband access promotes economic growth and expands
opportunities for home sales. A 2006 Commerce Department report
determined that property values are 6% higher in communities where
broadband is available.
For more info on the Austin market contact Craig Ellmaker at 512-784-1494 or at craig@ellmakerrealty.com
Best and Worst Bang for the Buck Cities
by Abha Bhattarai
Wednesday, October 15, 2008 provided by 
© Shutterstock
|
Your money will go farthest in Austin. |
The economic storm sweeping the country has left Americans with few places to hide.
But those looking to hunker down might want to head to Texas, where they can get the best value for their dollar.
That's because Austin and San Antonio lead our list of places where your money goes farthest. Residents of both enjoy affordable housing and promising prospects for job growth in coming years. Houston and Dallas also land in the top 10, at Nos. 4 and 7, respectively.
"Texas, as a whole, is one of the few economies that's performing extremely well because of the energy and technology sectors," says Andrew Gledhill, an economist at Moody's Economy.com. Plus, he added, military bases in San Antonio have continued to draw a steady steam of personnel and federal employees to the city, spurring widespread job growth.
The state's manufacturing sector has also grown in recent years, and a reputation for affordable housing continues to lure people to the South. When accounting for median household income, a house in Dallas, for example--with a median price of about $150,000--is four times more affordable than a house in Los Angeles, the worst-ranked city on our list.
A house in New York is three times less affordable than in Charlotte, N.C., and four times less than in Denver, two cities where your money goes far and where the median house costs $245,000, according to the National Association of Realtors.
Housing has remained affordable in the South and Midwest, thanks to growing populations, relatively lax building regulations and "lots and lots of land," said Daniel McCue, a research analyst at Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies.
Plus, he added, housing in cities like Houston "grew at a more controlled pace and didn't go overboard like in Phoenix or Las Vegas," which means houses won't lose much value in coming months.
Three Midwestern cities round out the top 10: Indianapolis; Columbus, Ohio; and Minneapolis. The worst-ranked cities, after Los Angeles, were Providence, R.I.; New Orleans; Philadelphia; and Cleveland.
Behind the Numbers
To ensure that our list reflected future value instead of past bargains, we began by looking at projected job growth through 2012 in the 40 largest U.S.-Census-defined metropolitan areas of the country with data from Moody's Economy.com.
Texan cities were a clear winner, with economists predicting job growth of at least 2% by 2012 in Austin, San Antonio, Dallas and Houston. By comparison, job growth in cities at the bottom of our list, including Los Angeles, Philadelphia and Cleveland, is expected to be about 0.2%.
© iStockphoto
|
Los Angeles was the worst-ranked city. |
We then calculated the ratios between each city's median house price and median household income, using 2000 U.S. Census figures, the latest available, and 2007 data from the National Association of Realtors. Next, we compared median income to Moody's cost of living index.
Final factors included the average gas price in each city on a given day in October as collected by AAA, and year-over-year inflation growth as calculated by Moody's and Forbes.com.
Top Spots
The factors that make the cities on our list valuable--affordable housing, relatively low gas prices, sluggish inflation, a job market that's more vibrant than most--are more than an indication of cheap deals. Instead, they give us a glimpse of the cities that are likely to offer value. Cities like Detroit (which didn't make it to our list) are cheap, but low-income figures and a fading job market won't do much for sustaining worth.
The cities where you'll get the least value include areas like Los Angeles, New York and Washington, D.C., where median house prices are more than $400,000 and relatively few people can afford them. Cities like Providence, R.I., and Philadelphia are suffering from large waves of out-migration as more and more residents decide to pick up and leave. As a result, local economies stagnate, and prospects for job growth seem bleak--economists predict the number of jobs in Philadelphia will grow by 0.2% by 2012 and by 0.1% in Providence.
But, economists say, no state has been as hard hit as California.
"California is being faced with a combination of a zillion things--the state's been in a prolonged recession, and at the same time, you have some of the least affordable housing in the country,” says Gledhill. "We'll probably start seeing a bottom in the housing market late next year, but it'll be a while until we see a real recovery."
Los Angeles' misfortunes, however, have helped boost the economy in cities like Portland, Ore. It and Seattle have become attractive alternatives for those looking to leave California in search of affordable housing and lower costs of living.
The value of a dollar in different cities is also closely linked to local inflation rates. In Austin, for example, year-over-year inflation rates rose by 5%, while in Portland, that figure was nearly 5.7%. Local inflation rates ranged from 3.2% in St. Louis (No. 8 on the worst list) to 5.82% in Dallas (No. 7 on the best list).
But keep in mind, even cities that ranked well on our list aren't immune from the forces of today's downturn. Gledhill says economic growth in Portland, which has already begun to slow, will be compounded further by California's slowdown.
Things won't be much better in Columbus, according to Bodhi Ganguli, an economist at Moody's. So far, the city has weathered the storm better than its local counterparts. But he said, "an extremely high foreclosure rate" and bleak expectations for job growth will begin to take their toll on the city's economy.
Things may turn for those in Charlotte, which has fared relatively well so far. That's because housing prices never reached exorbitant highs, which shielded the city from a major housing bust.
But as the Charlotte-based Wachovia get swallowed by Wells Fargo, Gledhill says, "a more measured deterioration is on its way."
For more info on the Austin market contact Craig Ellmaker at 512-784-1494 o craig@ellmakerrealty.com
Filed under: Real Estate, Market Conditions, For Sale, Open Houses, Announcements, Events, Technology, Industry, Point2, Finances, Buyer Information, Seller Information, Austin, Texas Community Information